![]() The next example will demonstrate how a rebase pull works. A -rebase option can be passed to git pull to use a rebase merging strategy instead of a merge commit. This example is one of a few git pull merging strategies. This commit is a new merge commit that contains the contents of remote A-B-C commits and has a combined log message. In the above diagram, we can see the new commit H. The pull process will then create a new local merge commit containing the content of the new diverged remote commits. git pull will fetch the diverged remote commits which are A-B-C. In this scenario, git pull will download all the changes from the point where the local and main diverged. Assume we have a repository with a main branch and a remote origin. To better demonstrate the pull and merging process let us consider the following example. Then a git merge is executed to merge the remote content refs and heads into a new local merge commit. The git pull command first runs git fetch which downloads content from the specified remote repository. ![]() A new merge commit will be-created and HEAD updated to point at the new commit. Once the content is downloaded, git pull will enter a merge workflow. In the first stage of operation git pull will execute a git fetch scoped to the local branch that HEAD is pointed at. The git pull command is actually a combination of two other commands, git fetch followed by git merge. Merging remote upstream changes into your local repository is a common task in Git-based collaboration work flows. Then what's next? You can do a git merge, which will be the same effect as git pull (when combined with the previous git fetch), or, as I would prefer, do a git rebase origin/master to apply your change on top of origin/master, which gives you a cleaner history.The git pull command is used to fetch and download content from a remote repository and immediately update the local repository to match that content. ![]() Now you have the remote changes in another branch, and you keep your local files intact. | * 5437ca5 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) test1 Your result local repository would be like this: * ed0bcb2 - (HEAD, master) test2 If you want to see what test1 is without modifying your local repository, run this: $ git fetch ![]() * 4942854 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) firstĪnd the origin repository is like this (someone else has committed test1): * 5437ca5 - (HEAD, master) test1Īt this point of time, git will complain and ask you to pull first if you try to push your test2 to remote repository. Suppose your repository is like this (you've made changes test2: * ed0bcb2 - (HEAD, master) test2 See What is the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? for more discussion. Actually git pull is a two step operation: a non-destructive git fetch followed by a git merge. Then in order to get remote changes to your local repository without making changes to your local files, you can use git fetch. So you have committed your local changes to your local repository. Things will work out much better this way - it will probably keep your changes without any real work on your part, while alerting you to serious, serious issues. If, on the other hand, there were real conflicts between what you pulled in Step 2 and your modifications (due to someone else editing in the interim), you'll find out and be told to resolve them. If everything goes smoothly, then you'll be all set! That will merge your modified versions that you stashed away in Step 1 with the versions you just pulled in Step 2. If it does, then you've got some work to do, and you'll be glad you did. If it doesn't, then the next step will work smoothly. Now, hopefully, that won't get any new versions of the files you're worried about. That will save away your local updates into the stash, then revert your modified files back to their pre-edit state. That said, though, it's really easy to do the "right thing." I understand that you want your local copies to "override" what's in the remote, but, oh, man, if someone has modified the files in the remote repo in some different way, and you just ignore their changes and try to "force" your own changes without even looking at possible conflicts, well, I weep for you (and your coworkers) -)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |